Prenatal testing is an important issue and carries more consequences than we are sometimes aware. I do not personally oppose prenatal testing, but rather the lack of information and support given to women and families who receive a prenatal diagnosis. Parents who are already enduring the grief of having a child with this diagnosis are then faced with having to battle the medical community because of having a prenatal diagnosis. After receiving a prenatal diagnosis as difficult and devastating as trisomy 18 and deciding to continue the pregnancy, many parents are denied medical interventions such as an echocardiogram to evaluate the baby's heart, a c-section to decrease stress on the baby, and resuscitation at birth since the child statistically is not expected to survive for very long. Because we did not have a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18 with Julia, I was given a c-section (best for her compromised heart) and she was given respiratory support (she was on bi-pap for about 6 hours until she could breathe on her own). She was evaluated and placed in the NICU for observation. Her heart and kidneys were evaluated. I do not know what our experience would have been like at our particular hospital if we had known before birth. However, I know many parents who have had to take on hospitals and fight for support. Some parents with a prenatal diagnosis have been able to meet ahead of time with NICU staff to find out their approach to babies with trisomy 18 and if they met resistance they had time to find another hospital. So, yes, prenatal testing is a big deal, or rather the knowledge than comes along with prenatal testing is a big -- a very big -- deal.
Although I am not a supporter of Rick Santorum for president, I am thankful for the debates being raised on behalf of his daughter Bella and all children with trisomy 18. And as Mr. Klein so eloquently states...
"I am haunted by the smiling photos I’ve seen of Isabella with her father and mother, brothers and sisters. No doubt she struggles through many of her days–she nearly died a few weeks ago–but she has also been granted three years of unconditional love and the ability to smile and bring joy. Her tenuous survival has given her family a deeper sense of how precious even the frailest of lives are.
All right, I can hear you saying, the Santorum family’s course may be admirable, but shouldn’t we have the right to make our own choices? Yes, I suppose. But I also worry that we’ve become too averse to personal inconvenience as a society–that we’re less rigorous parents than we should be, that we’ve farmed out our responsibilities, especially for the disabled, to the state–and I’m grateful to Santorum for forcing on me the discomfort of having to think about the moral implications of his daughter’s smile."
Thanks for.sharing.Jenny
ReplyDeleteI read and was touched by Joe Klein's article too Jenny. What you shared made it all the more beautiful to read it again through your eyes.
ReplyDeleteVictoria
http://www.takingontrisomy18.org
I haven't read the article yet, but I will do that tonight. Thank you for your insight. It is perfectly stated, as always.
ReplyDeleteWow. Not a very articulate response on my part, but that is how I feel reading your post. I am very touched by Klein's commentary and your presentation of it. The moral implications of a smile. I appreciate that comment, and also the observation that our society has become so focussed on convenience that we are doing disservice to the so called 'disabled' among us. Thank you for sharing this. I agree with Victoria's comments, she was much more articulate than I. I appreciate your blog, Jenny.
ReplyDelete